Impacto de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la creatividad de los estudiantes universitarios

Gina Exivia Valencia Mendoza

Universidad Estatal De Bolívar, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y del Ser Humano, Ernesto Che Guevara s/n y Av. Gabriel Secaira, provincia Bolívar, Guaranda – Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5877-4459

Rocío del Lourdes Barragán Merino

Universidad Estatal De Bolívar, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Ernesto Che Guevara s/n y Av. Gabriel Secaira, provincia Bolívar, Guaranda – Ecuador.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2261-521X

Susana Carolina Ledesma Trujillo

Instituto Superior Tecnológico El Libertador, provincia Bolívar, San José de Chimbo – Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8533-6210

Patricia Moraima Peña

Universidad Estatal De Bolívar, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Ernesto Che Guevara s/n y Av. Gabriel Secaira, provincia Bolívar, Guaranda – Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8533-6210

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55204/trj.v3i1.e33

Palabras clave: Inteligencia artificial generativa, creatividad estudiantil, educación superior, desafíos en la educación


Resumen

La investigación sobre la influencia de la inteligencia artificial generativa (IAG) en la creatividad de los estudiantes es crucial en el contexto actual de rápida evolución tecnológica y educativa. Con la creciente integración de la IAG en la educación superior, comprender su impacto en el pensamiento creativo es fundamental para maximizar los beneficios y abordar posibles desafíos. El objetivo de esta investigación es dilucidar las perspectivas de los educadores universitarios sobre cómo la IA generativa afecta el aprendizaje y la enseñanza en la educación superior y las investigaciones dadas hasta el momento. Para lograr esto, se empleó una metodología rigurosa, que incluyó una revisión sistemática siguiendo las pautas establecidas por Higgins JPT (2011) y el Informe PRISMA, junto con las etapas propuestas por otros autores para las revisiones sistemáticas de artículos científicos. Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda exhaustiva en bases de datos como Scopus (ScieceDirect), Web of Science, Redalyc y Scielo, utilizando palabras clave pertinentes como "Sistemas de procesamiento del lenguaje natural (PLN) y creatividad estudiantil" e "Inteligencia artificial generativa". Con la aplicación de la metodología se determinó 12 artículos científicos que abordan el tema. Las conclusiones obtenidas hacen alusión a que la sinergia entre la inteligencia artificial (IA) y los seres humanos impulsa la creatividad, subrayando la necesidad de colaboración interdisciplinaria. ChatGPT-3 y otras IA potencian el pensamiento creativo estudiantil, desafiando percepciones previas sobre la creatividad. No obstante, surgen dilemas éticos que exigen atención para asegurar un uso responsable de la IA en la creatividad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Alabbasi, Ahmed M. Abdulla, Sue Hyeon Paek, Daehyun Kim, y Bonnie Cramond. 2022. «What Do Educators Need to Know about the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: A Comprehensive Review». Frontiers in Psychology 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000385.

wael AL-khatib, Ayman. 2023. «Drivers of generative artificial intelligence to fostering exploitative and exploratory innovation: A TOE framework». Technology in Society 75:102403. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102403.

Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, Samar Abdalla, Emmanuel Mogaji, Amany Elbanna, y Yogesh K. Dwivedi. 2024. «The impending disruption of creative industries by generative AI: Opportunities, challenges, and research agenda». International Journal of Information Management 102759. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102759.

Anón. 2023. «Impact of Participative and Authoritarian Leadership on Employee Creativity: Organizational Citizenship Behavior as a Mediator». International Journal of Organization Theory & Behaviour 26(3):221-36. doi: 10.1108/IJOTB-08-2022-0165.

Awidi, Isaiah T. 2024. «Comparing Expert Tutor Evaluation of Reflective Essays with Marking by Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool». Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 100226. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100226.

Bai, Honghong, Hanna Mulder, Mirjam Moerbeek, Evelyn H. Kroesbergen, y Paul P. M. Leseman. 2021. «Divergent thinking in four-year-old children: An analysis of thinking processes in performing the Alternative Uses Task». Thinking Skills and Creativity 40:100814. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100814.

Bart, William. 2023. «Can artificial intelligence identify creativity?: An empirical study». Journal of Creativity 33(2):100057. doi: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100057.

Bearman, Margaret, Juliana Ryan, y Rola Ajjawi. 2022. «Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: a critical literature review | Higher Education». High Educ, 369-85.

Bedington, Andelyn, Emma F. Halcomb, Heidi A. McKee, Thomas Sargent, y Adler Smith. 2024. «Writing with generative AI and human-machine teaming: Insights and recommendations from faculty and students». Computers and Composition 71:102833. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102833.

Biswas, Som S. 2023. «Potential Use of Chat GPT in Global Warming». Annals of Biomedical Engineering 51(6):1126-27. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03171-8.

Brandt, Anthony K. 2023. «Beethoven’s Ninth and AI’s Tenth: A comparison of human and computational creativity». Journal of Creativity 33(3):100068. doi: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100068.

Chen, Lingjiao, Matei Zaharia, y James Zou. 2023. «How is ChatGPT’s behavior changing over time?»

Chiarello, Filippo, Vito Giordano, Irene Spada, Simone Barandoni, y Gualtiero Fantoni. 2024. «Future applications of generative large language models: A data-driven case study on ChatGPT». Technovation 133:103002. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103002.

Chirico, Alice, Vlad Petre Glaveanu, Pietro Cipresso, Giuseppe Riva, y Andrea Gaggioli. 2018. «Awe Enhances Creative Thinking: An Experimental Study: Creativity Research Journal: Vol 30 , No 2 - Get Access». Creativity Research Journal.

Chiu, Thomas K. F., Qi Xia, Xinyan Zhou, Ching Sing Chai, y Miaoting Cheng. 2023. «Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education». Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 4:100118. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118.

Cooper. 2023. «Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence | Journal of Science Education and Technology». Springer Link, 444-52.

Dagli, Gokmen, Fahriye Altinay, y Zehra Altinay. 2024. «Evaluation of artificial intelligence in education and its applications according to the opinions of school administrators». Pp. 167-73 en Computational Intelligence and Blockchain in Complex Systems, Advanced Studies in Complex Systems, editado por F. Al-Turjman. Morgan Kaufmann.

Ding, Guozhu, Yiwei He, Kaixu Yi, y Shan Li. 2024. «Using the divergent association task to measure divergent thinking in Chinese elementary school students». Thinking Skills and Creativity 52:101503. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101503.

Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Nir Kshetri, Laurie Hughes, Emma Louise Slade, Anand Jeyaraj, Arpan Kumar Kar, Abdullah M. Baabdullah, Alex Koohang, Vishnupriya Raghavan, Manju Ahuja, Hanaa Albanna. 2023. «Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy». International Journal of Information Management 71:102642. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

Ferreira González, Ignacio, Gerard Urrútia, y Pablo Alonso-Coello. 2011. «Revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación». Revista Española de Cardiología 64(8):688-96. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.03.029.

Gignac, Gilles E., y Eva T. Szodorai. 2024. «Defining intelligence: Bridging the gap between human and artificial perspectives». Intelligence 104:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2024.101832.

Gupta, Ruchi, Kiran Nair, Mahima Mishra, Blend Ibrahim, y Seema Bhardwaj. 2024. «Adoption and impacts of generative artificial intelligence: Theoretical underpinnings and research agenda». International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 4(1):100232. doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100232.

Haase, Jennifer, y Paul H. P. Hanel. 2023. «Artificial muses: Generative artificial intelligence chatbots have risen to human-level creativity». Journal of Creativity 33(3):100066. doi: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100066.

Habib, Sabrina, Thomas Vogel, Xiao Anli, y Evelyn Thorne. 2024. «How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity?» Journal of Creativity 34(1):100072. doi: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072.

Higgins JPT. 2011. «Manual Cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones».

Hou, Shumeng, Shangbao Chen, Zhihong Huang, Xuejiao Yin, Kexin Zhao, y Jun Zou. 2023. «Mapping the neural mechanisms of creativity by convergent and divergent thinking in school-aged children: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study». Thinking Skills and Creativity 49:101300. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101300.

Hyun Baek, Tae, y Minseong Kim. 2023. «Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence». Telematics and Informatics 83:102030. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2023.102030.

Ivcevic, Zorana, y Mike Grandinetti. 2024. «Artificial intelligence as a tool for creativity». Journal of Creativity 34(2):100079. doi: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100079.

Joksimovic, Srecko, Dirk Ifenthaler, Rebecca Marrone, Maarten De Laat, y George Siemens. 2023. «Opportunities of artificial intelligence for supporting complex problem-solving: Findings from a scoping review». Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 4:100138. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100138.

Kaufman, James C., y Ronald A. Beghetto. 2009. «Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity - James C. Kaufman, Ronald A. Beghetto, 2009». Review of General Psychology.

King, Michael R. 2023. «A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education». Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering 16(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8.

Köbis, Nils, y Luca D. Mossink. 2021. «Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry». Computers in Human Behavior 114:106553. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553.

Kohnke, Lucas, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, y Di Zou. 2023. «Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study». Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 5:100156. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156.

Lee, Daniel, Matthew Arnold, Amit Srivastava, Katrina Plastow, Peter Strelan, Florian Ploeckl, Dimitra Lekkas, y Edward Palmer. 2024. «The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives». Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 6:100221. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221.

Li, Guanyu, Ruiqi Chu, y Tang Tang. 2024. «Creativity Self Assessments in Design Education: A Systematic Review». Thinking Skills and Creativity 52:101494. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101494.

Lodge, J., K. Thompson, y Corrin. 2023. «Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education | Australasian Journal of Educational Technology». Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

Lou, Yongqi. 2023. «Human Creativity in the AIGC Era». She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 9(4):541-52. doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002.

Markauskaite, Lina, Rebecca Marrone, Oleksandra Poquet, Simon Knight, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Sarah Howard, Jo Tondeur, Maarten De Laat, Simon Buckingham Shum, Dragan Gašević, y George Siemens. 2022. «Rethinking the entwinement between artificial intelligence and human learning: What capabilities do learners need for a world with AI?» Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 3:100056. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100056.

Marrone, Rebecca, Victoria Taddeo, y Gillian Hill. 2022. «Creativity and Artificial Intelligence—A Student Perspective». Journal of Intelligence.

McGrath, Cormac, Teresa Cerratto Pargman, Niklas Juth, y Per J. Palmgren. 2023. «University teachers’ perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education - An experimental philosophical study». Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 4:100139. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139.

Messer, Uwe. 2024. «Co-creating art with generative artificial intelligence: Implications for artworks and artists». Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2(1):100056. doi: 10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100056.

Mikalef, Patrick, y Manjul Gupta. 2021. «Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance». Information & Management 58(3):103434. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2021.103434.

Murugesan, San, y Aswani Kumar Cherukuri. 2023. «The Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Education: The Promises and Perils». Computer 56(05):116-21. doi: 10.1109/MC.2023.3253292.

Perestelo-Pérez, Lilisbeth. 2013. «Standards on How to Develop and Report Systematic Reviews in Psychology and Health». International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 13(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(13)70007-3.

Pires, Luís, y João Varajão. 2024. «Creativity as a topic in project management – A scoping review and directions for research». Thinking Skills and Creativity 51:101477. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101477.

Ray, Partha Pratim. 2023. «ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope». Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems 3:121-54. doi: 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.

Saleem, Sumayya, Samantha Burns, y Michal Perlman. 2024. «Cultivating young minds: Exploring the relationship between child socio-emotional competence, early childhood education and care quality, creativity and self-directed learning». Learning and Individual Differences 111:102440. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102440.

Townsend, David M., y Richard A. Hunt. 2019. «Entrepreneurial action, creativity, & judgment in the age of artificial intelligence». Journal of Business Venturing Insights 11:e00126. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00126.

Vinchon, Florent, Todd Lubart, Sabrina Bartolotta, Valentin Gironnay, Marion Botella, Samira Bourgeois-Bougrine, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, y Nathalie Bonnardel. 2023. «Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A Manifesto for Collaboration». Journal of Creative Behavior.

Wang, Xi, Bernhard Hommel, Lorenza Colzato, Dong He, Ke Ding, Cheng Liu, Jiang Qiu, y Qunlin Chen. 2023. «The contribution of divergent and convergent thinking to visual creativity». Thinking Skills and Creativity 49:101372. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101372.

Wieland, Britt, Jan de Wit, y Alwin de Rooij. 2022. «Electronic Brainstorming With a Chatbot Partner: A Good Idea Due to Increased Productivity and Idea Diversity». Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 5. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.880673.

Yilmaz, Ramazan, y Fatma Gizem Karaoglan Yilmaz. 2023. «The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation». Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 4:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147.

Zaboli, Arian, Francesco Brigo, Serena Sibilio, Michael Mian, y Gianni Turcato. 2024. «Human intelligence versus Chat-GPT: who performs better in correctly classifying patients in triage?» The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 79:44-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.008.